Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Franchisor Did Not Waive Arbitration by Moving to Dismiss for Improper Venue
Posted in Arbitration

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld the dismissal of a franchise-related lawsuit in light of the existence of a binding arbitration provision. In Faulkenberg v. CB Tax Franchise Systems, LP, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6391 (7th Cir. Mar. 29, 2011), a disgruntled franchisee brought suit against its tax preparation franchisor after closing its five franchised outlets. The franchisee-plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the franchisor violated the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act by failing to register its offering circular in the state prior to the sale. The parties disputed whether the Illinois Act applied to their relationship. The franchise agreements at issue contained arbitration clauses which stated that all claims relating to “the franchise” would be subject to arbitration in Houston, Texas. Consequently, the franchisor removed plaintiff’s action from Illinois state court to the applicable federal district court, and then moved to dismiss the action for improper venue.

The franchisee, for its part, argued that the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act voids any forum selection clause requiring a forum outside of Illinois. The court made quick work of this assertion, noting that the Act explicitly states that “a franchise agreement may provide for arbitration in a forum outside of” Illinois. The franchisee also argued that the franchisor had waived its right to enforce the arbitration clause when it appeared in Illinois court to challenge the franchisee-plaintiff’s choice of venue. The court also rejected this claim, noting that several Seventh Circuit cases had previously held that “a motion to dismiss based on a contractual arbitration clause is appropriately ‘conceptualized as an objection to venue, and hence properly raised’” as a motion to dismiss. Finally, the court rejected the plaintiff-franchisee’s argument that the agreement to arbitrate was obtained by fraud, noting that the franchisee admitted receiving a copy of the agreement and there was no legitimate dispute as to whether the franchisee had signed the agreement. The franchisee also acknowledged receiving (and signing a receipt for) the franchisor’s offering circular, which summarized the arbitration provision. The court affirmed dismissal of the plaintiff’s case, leaving the franchisee to pursue arbitration.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors